Do I Have A Medical Malpractice-Wrongful Death Case?

The scope of the medical malpractice issue.

Data differ considerably on the number of medical errors that occur in the United States. Some research studies place the number of medical mistakes in excess of one million every year while other research studies put the number as low as a couple of hundred thousand. It is extensively accepted nevertheless that iatrogenic illness (illness or injury triggered by a medical mistake or medical treatment) is the 3rd leading cause of death in the United States after cardiovascular disease and cancer. See, The JOURNAL of the AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (JAMA) Vol 284, No 4, July 26th 2000.

As an attorney who has actually restricted his practice to representation of victims injured by somebody else's negligence, medical or otherwise, I have actually gotten countless calls from potential clients over the last Twenty Years asking me if they have a medical malpractice case. Since medical malpractice lawsuits is extremely costly and very lengthy the legal representatives in our firm are really cautious exactly what medical malpractice cases in which we choose to get involved. It is not uncommon for a lawyer, or law practice to advance litigation expenses in excess of $100,000.00 simply to obtain a case to trial. These expenses are the expenses connected with pursuing the lawsuits that include skilled witness costs, deposition costs, exhibit preparation and court costs. What follows is an overview of the issues, concerns and considerations that the lawyers in our firm consider when discussing with a customer a potential medical malpractice case.

Exactly What is Medical Malpractice?

Medical Malpractice is medical treatment that breaches of the "Requirement of Care" for medical physicians (or nurses, chiropractic doctors, dental practitioners, podiatrists etc.) which leads to an injury or death. "Requirement of Care" means medical treatment that an affordable, prudent medical supplier in the same community ought to supply. The majority of cases involve a dispute over what the suitable standard of care is. The requirement of care is normally offered through making use of professional testament from consulting doctors that practice or teach medication in the exact same specialty as the accused( s).

When did the malpractice happen (Statute of Limitations)?

Rand Spear Law Office
Two Penn Center Plaza, 1500 John F Kennedy Blvd #200, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA
+1 215-985-2424

In Ohio the medical malpractice statute of restrictions is one year from the date of the malpractice, or the last date the accused treated the plaintiff (victim) or the date the complainant found or fairly must have discovered the malpractice. Some states have a two year statute of constraints. In Ohio if the victim is a small the statute of restrictions will not even start to run till the minor becomes 18 years old. Be advised however derivative claims for moms and dads might run many years previously. If you think you may have a case it is essential you call an attorney soon. Regardless of the statute of constraints, doctors relocate, witnesses disappear and memories fade. The earlier counsel is engaged the quicker important evidence can be preserved and the much better your opportunities are of dominating.

What did the physician do or fail to do?

Simply because a client does not have a successful result from a surgical treatment, medical treatment or medical treatment does not in and of itself mean the medical professional slipped up. Medical practice is by no implies a warranty of health or a total recovery. Most of the time when a patient experiences an unsuccessful result from medical treatment it is not since the medical service provider made a mistake. The majority of the time when there is a bad medical result it is in spite of excellent, quality medical care not because of sub-standard healthcare.

5 Tips From a Patent Attorney - Inventors Digest

There is no easy way to say this, so I’ll just say it. If you want competent representation from a patent attorney or patent agent, you cannot come off like a crazy inventor: out of touch with reality and/or combative. Sure, even an inventor wearing a tinfoil hat may eventually be able to find a desperate patent practitioner to represent him or her, but you’d rather be working with the professional of your choice. 5 Tips From a Patent Attorney - Inventors Digest

When going over a possible case with a client it is very important that the customer have the ability to inform us why they think there was medical negligence. As all of us understand individuals frequently pass away from cancer, heart disease or organ failure even with excellent healthcare. Nevertheless, we likewise understand that individuals generally should not pass away from knee surgery, appendix elimination, hernia repair or some other "small" surgical treatment. When something extremely unforeseen like that happens it definitely deserves exploring whether there was a medical mistake. If in doubt most medical malpractice legal representatives will discuss your case with you informally on the telephone. A lot of legal representatives do not charge for a preliminary consultation in carelessness cases.

So what if there was a medical mistake (proximate cause)?

In any negligence case not only is the burden of proof on the plaintiff to prove the medical malpractice the complainant need to likewise show that as a direct outcome of the medical neglect some injury or death resulted (damages). This is called "near cause." Considering that medical malpractice lawsuits is so pricey to pursue the injuries must be substantial to call for moving forward with the case. All medical errors are "malpractice" however only a little percentage of mistakes generate medical malpractice cases.

By way of example, if a moms and dad takes his kid to the emergency clinic after a skateboard accident and the ER doctor doesn't do x-rays in spite of an apparent bend in the child's forearm and tells the papa his kid has "just a sprain" this likely is medical malpractice. But, if the child is effectively diagnosed within a few days and makes a complete recovery it is unlikely the "damages" are serious sufficient to carry out a lawsuit that likely would cost in excess of $50,000.00. However, if because of the delay in being correctly diagnosed, the kid needs to have his arm re-broken and the development plate is irreparably damaged due to the delay then the damages likely would warrant additional examination and a possible lawsuit. .

Other problems that are necessary when identifying whether a customer has a malpractice case include the victim's habits and medical history. Did the victim do anything to trigger or contribute to the bad medical result? A typical technique of medical malpractice defense attorneys is to blame the patient. If is a birth injury case, did the mom have proper prenatal care, did she smoke or use drugs throughout her pregnancy? In other cases, did the client follow the doctor's orders, keep his visits, take his medicine as advised and tell the physician the truth? These are facts that we have to understand in order to identify whether the physician will have a valid defense to the malpractice lawsuit?

Exactly what happens if it appears like there is a case?

If it appears that the patient may have been a victim of a medical error, the medical mistake triggered a significant injury or death and the patient was certified with his medical professional's orders, then we have to get the patient's medical records. In many cases, acquiring the medical records involves nothing more mailing a release signed by the customer to the physician and/or medical facility together with a letter requesting the records. When it comes to wrongful death, an administrator of the victims estate has to be appointed in the local county court of probate and then the administrator can sign the release requesting the records.

Once the records are gotten we evaluate them to make sure they are total. It is not unusual in medical carelessness cases to receive insufficient medical charts. As soon as all the pertinent records are gotten they are supplied to a certified medical professional for evaluation and viewpoint. If the case is against an emergency clinic physician we have an emergency room doctor evaluate the case, if it protests a cardiologist we have to acquire a viewpoint from a cardiologist, etc

. Mostly, exactly what we need to know form the expert is 1) was the treatment offered below the requirement of care, 2) did the violation of the requirement of care result in the clients injury or death? If the medical professionals viewpoint is favorable on both counts a claim will be prepared on the client's behalf and generally submitted in the court of common pleas in the county where the malpractice was devoted or in the county where the offender lives. In some limited circumstances jurisdiction for the malpractice claim could be federal court or some other court.


In sum, an excellent malpractice legal representative will carefully and completely review any possible malpractice case prior to submitting a claim. It's unfair to the victim or the doctors to submit a suit unless the expert informs us that he believes there is a strong basis to bring the lawsuit. Due to the expenditure of pursuing a medical neglect action no good legal representative has the time or resources to squander on a "frivolous claim."

When speaking with insurance bodily injury claims is necessary to properly give the legal representative as much detail as possible and address the attorney's questions as completely as possible. Prior to speaking to a lawyer think about making some notes so you remember some crucial reality or situation the legal representative may need.

Finally, if you believe you may have a malpractice case contact a good malpractice lawyer as soon as possible so there are no statute of constraints problems in your case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *